Sada Nahimana vs Monika Stankiewicz Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W L W W L
Form
L W W L L L L W W LHead-2-Head: Nahimana 1 - 1 Stankiewicz
They have played 4 sets in total, with Nahimana winning 2 and Stankiewicz winning 2. The last match between Nahimana and Stankiewicz was at the W50 Bujumbura, 04-04-2025, Quarterfinals, Clay with Sada Nahimana getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sada Nahimana | 1 |
| Monika Stankiewicz | 1 |
W50 Bujumbura(04-04-2025)
6
3
6
1
| Nahimana | Stats | Stankiewicz |
|---|---|---|
| 78% (18-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (4-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 252 | Ranking | 535 |
| 244 | Highest Rank | 535 |
| 24 | Age | 18 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 1 |
| 61% (204-130) | Career Total W/L | 67% (22-11) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Vekic VS Navarro PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Nahimana VS Stankiewicz H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Sada Nahimana
Player
Monika Stankiewicz
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats
Monika Stankiewicz
Player
Sada Nahimana
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
105)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
9
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
Nahimana VS Stankiewicz H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 22 | Games Won | 18 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 13 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:47:34 | Average Match Time | 1:47:34 |
| 67% (102/152) | 1st Serve % | 69% (80/116) |
| 66% (67/102) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (50/80) |
| 36% (18/50) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (12/36) |
| 50% (8/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (6/16) |
| 47% (54/116) | Return Points Win % | 44% (67/152) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sada Nahimana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Sada Nahimana
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Amina Anshba
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Sara Borkop
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
26 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sada Nahimana
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Amandine Hesse
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
9
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Monika Stankiewicz
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Merel Hoedt
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Wozuko Mdlulwa
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Monika Stankiewicz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Monika Stankiewicz
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Monika Stankiewicz
Player
Darja Suvirdjonkova
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
13
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
2 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Monika Stankiewicz
Player
Stephanie Judith Visscher
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
40%
(
25 of
63)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Kazionova
Player
Monika Stankiewicz
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Monika Stankiewicz
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve %
71%
(
22 of
31)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
43%
(
15 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
42
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martyna Kubka
Player
Monika Stankiewicz
62%
(
69 of
111)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
111)
8
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
9
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
43 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Angella Okutoyi
Player
Monika Stankiewicz
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
7
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
91
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Monika Stankiewicz
Player
Valeriya Strakhova
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
68%
(
76 of
111)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
7
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
43 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
57 of
111)
109
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Monika Stankiewicz
Player
Demi Tran
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Monika Stankiewicz
94%
(
47 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (204/130) | Win/Loss | 67% (22/11) |
| 59% (438/307) | Sets Win/Loss | 65% (48/26) |
| 54% (3605/3108) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (362/298) |
| 61% (42/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 85% (11/2) |
| 63% (151/89) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) |
| 44% (11/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 602 | Aces Total | 25 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.55 |
| 885 | Total Double Faults | 177 |
| 1:39:47 | Average Match Time | 1:44:19 |
| 471.84 | Average Opponent Rank | 361.09 |
| 67% (14301/21243) | 1st Serve % | 66% (1388/2117) |
| 60% (8611/14301) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (823/1388) |
| 46% (3218/6943) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (295/729) |
| 49% (1390/2816) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (164/323) |
| 47% (10080/21393) | Return Points Win % | 51% (1097/2160) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (165/109) | Challenger W/L | 69% (18/8) |
| 70% (39/17) | Futures W/L | 57% (4/3) |
| 61% (201/331) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (22/33) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (35/65) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 58% (47/81) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (4/8) |
| 90% (198/179) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (23/20) |
| 10% (198/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (23/3) |
| 18% (136/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (10/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
